510(k) — US FDA
Which predicate do I claim, and what evidence proves substantial equivalence?
There is no predicate for my device. What route is left?
De Novo is the route for novel devices of low to moderate risk where no suitable predicate exists, so a 510(k) has nowhere to anchor.
The bar is higher than a 510(k) in a specific way. A successful De Novo creates a new device classification, along with the special controls that will govern it — so the submission has to establish what those controls should be, rather than compare against controls somebody else already established. You are writing the rule, not following it.
That has an upside worth planning for: once granted, the classification becomes a predicate that competitors can use. Being first through carries both the cost and the position.
Novel low-to-moderate-risk devices with no suitable predicate available.
Coordinated by Prequel. We build the pathway assessment, the evidence strategy and the submission package. The filing is run with a US regulatory specialist under our scope and review — FDA submission experience sits with that partner, not in house.
Many programmes target more than one market. Evidence generated for one route can often support another, which is worth planning before testing starts rather than after.
Which predicate do I claim, and what evidence proves substantial equivalence?
My device is high risk. What does a PMA actually demand?
What class is my device under Indian rules, and what does CDSCO need from me?
That is what the Readiness Assessment settles. Tell us the product, its intended use and your target market, and we will confirm the pathway before you commit to evidence.