FSSAI — Nutraceuticals
Can I sell this as a health supplement, and what am I allowed to claim on the label?
Most products do not stall on the science. They stall between the science and the market — on a classification nobody confirmed, evidence generated against the wrong requirement, or six vendors who never spoke to each other. Prequel runs that middle stretch as one programme.
A manufacturer with a finished device still has to determine its classification, decide which market to enter first, build a risk file, commission the right bench tests, work out whether clinical evidence is required, stand up a quality system, assemble a technical file, and answer an authority's questions — usually while running the rest of the business.
Each of those has a specialist available for hire. The difficulty is that they are normally hired separately, in sequence, and each one assumes decisions the previous one did not actually make. Rework at that scale is expensive, and it is nearly always discovered late.
Market Accelerator is the alternative: one roadmap, one point of accountability, and stage gates so you commit to the next phase only when the last one closed properly.
Stages run in sequence but you do not have to start at one. Most clients join where their gap is, and the readiness assessment tells them where that is.
Intended use, claims, target markets, classification hypothesis and gap assessment.
Typically joined here with: A working product or prototype and no confirmed regulatory route.
Design controls, risk management and evidence planning.
Testing strategy and qualified laboratory coordination.
Clinical strategy, protocol, sites and ethics committees, data and statistics.
Typically joined here with: A requirement for clinical data you have not run before.
India, US, EU and other target-market pathways.
QMS, suppliers, production controls and scale-up readiness.
Market segmentation, claims, evidence communication, channels and launch readiness.
Post-market surveillance, vigilance, PMCF and real-world evidence as applicable.
Most consultancies leave this vague. We would rather you knew before the contract than after it, so here is the split.
Our own team, working to our SOPs.
We define scope, manage timelines and review quality; a named specialist partner performs the work.
*Partner-delivered work is performed by named specialists under our scope, timeline and quality review. Partner identities are shared during discovery and under NDA. Regulatory filings are made by the sponsor, or by us only when expressly authorised in writing.
The right route depends on your device, its intended use and where you are going first. Each of these explains what the route requires.
Can I sell this as a health supplement, and what am I allowed to claim on the label?
What licence does an Ayurvedic or herbal product need, and who issues it?
What class is my device under Indian rules, and what does CDSCO need from me?
Which predicate do I claim, and what evidence proves substantial equivalence?
There is no predicate for my device. What route is left?
My device is high risk. What does a PMA actually demand?
What does EU MDR require beyond what I already have?
What does a device QMS need to contain, and are we audit ready?
How do I connect hazards to controls, and controls to evidence?
Do I need an import registration or a manufacturing licence — and who issues it?
What approvals does a clinical trial in India need, and in what order?
Does my product need a BIS licence, and against which Indian Standard?
This is a claim about how the work is organised, not a discount. The saving comes from not paying twice for the same thing.
Technical, regulatory, clinical, quality and commercial work planned together, so decisions in one do not invalidate work in another.
Early gap assessment reduces the risk of commissioning tests or studies that do not support the intended pathway or claims.
Modular resourcing means you do not build a full internal regulatory, clinical and quality team before you need one.
Controlled documentation and traceability reduce repeated work across markets where reuse is allowed.
Each stage ends in a go / no-go decision, so commitment is staged rather than made up front.
*Cost-effectiveness here describes coordination and staged commitment. It is not a claim about absolute price, and it is not a substitute for a quotation.
Most first engagements are a Readiness Assessment. It is deliberately small, and it tells you whether the rest is worth doing.
Early-stage product or prototype
A low-commitment assessment that identifies the regulatory, evidence and execution gaps before you spend on testing or studies.
A defined regulatory, clinical, quality or evidence requirement
Dedicated cross-functional execution against clear milestones.
End-to-end transition from R&D to commercialisation
Coordinated technical, regulatory, clinical, manufacturing and commercial programme under a single point of accountability.
A CRO, SMO or sponsor needing additional capacity
An embedded functional team working under your SOPs and oversight — our established clinical research business.
Tell us the product, the stage it has reached and the market you want. We will come back with where the gaps are and what closing them involves — before anyone commissions a test.
Typical response: 24 hours